CAIN-42 CAIN StudioHow CAIN-42 compares · AI security & scanners
CAIN-42 vs Pangea Cyber
A set of security APIs (redaction, audit logging, authentication, prompt guard) that developers call from their applications.
What Pangea Cyber does well
- Composable security APIs that are quick to integrate.
- Managed service with audit and redaction building blocks.
- Developer-friendly and well documented.
What CAIN-42 does differently
- Enforces at the tool-call boundary, before anything runs.
- Orders authorization through a Byzantine quorum (3-of-4): one "yes" is never enough.
- Leaves a per-action signed receipt you can verify offline with a clean-room verifier.
- Authority continuity: a change to the model, tool, memory, skill or delegation forces a re-check.
- Self-serve from $19.75/mo; runs hosted, self-hosted or air-gapped.
Capability difference
| Capability | CAIN-42 | Pangea Cyber | Source (verified 2026-10-14) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Runtime governance in the execution path | Security APIs for applications | Pangea source page verified 2026-10-14 |
| Blocks the tool call at the boundary | Yes — MCPGate halts before the tool runs | Partial (prompt guard / audit APIs) | |
| Byzantine-ordered authorization (quorum cert) | Yes — 3-of-4 PBFT quorum certificate | No* | |
| Per-action signed receipt, offline-verifiable | Yes — Ed25519, hash-chained, offline-verifiable | Audit logs (service-hosted) | |
| Native MCP proxying + quorum authorization | Yes | Generic API security | |
| Public entry price | $19.75/mo self-serve | Usage-based |
When to pick which
Pick Pangea for composable security APIs. Pick CAIN-42 for an agent-native gate that authorizes and records each tool call.
Based on each vendor's public homepage and product pages, last reviewed 2026-10-14. No affiliation and no claim about their internals. "No*" means we found no public documentation of that capability, not that the vendor cannot do it.