CAIN-42 CAIN Studio

How CAIN-42 compares · Platform agent governance

CAIN-42 vs Anthropic Claude Agent SDK + Managed Agents

The Claude Agent SDK runs the Claude Code agent with built-in tools, subagents, hooks, MCP, sessions and permission modes (hooks, deny, ask, mode, allow). Sandbox mode is available and was open-sourced; Managed Agents host sessions in a sandbox.

What Anthropic Claude Agent SDK + Managed Agents does well

  • Deep, native MCP support and a clean permission model.
  • A sandbox mode for running agent code, open-sourced.
  • First-class integration with the Claude models.

What CAIN-42 does differently

  • Enforces at the tool-call boundary, before anything runs.
  • Orders authorization through a Byzantine quorum (3-of-4): one "yes" is never enough.
  • Leaves a per-action signed receipt you can verify offline with a clean-room verifier.
  • Authority continuity: a change to the model, tool, memory, skill or delegation forces a re-check.
  • Self-serve from $19.75/mo; runs hosted, self-hosted or air-gapped.

Capability difference

CapabilityCAIN-42Anthropic Claude Agent SDK + Managed AgentsSource (verified 2026-10-14)
Primary focusRuntime governance in the execution pathAgent harness with permission modes and MCPAnthropic source page
verified 2026-10-14
Blocks the tool call at the boundaryYes — MCPGate halts before the tool runsPartial (permission engine: deny/ask/allow)
Byzantine-ordered authorization (quorum cert)Yes — 3-of-4 PBFT quorum certificateNo*
Per-action signed receipt, offline-verifiableYes — Ed25519, hash-chained, offline-verifiableSession transcripts
Vendor-neutralHosted, self-hosted or air-gappedTied to Claude
Public entry price$19.75/mo self-serveFree SDK; model usage billed

When to pick which

Pick the Claude Agent SDK for the cleanest native MCP and permission model on Claude. Pick CAIN-42 when you need a cross-model enforcement boundary with quorum-ordered authorization and verifiable evidence.

Based on each vendor's public homepage and product pages, last reviewed 2026-10-14. No affiliation and no claim about their internals. "No*" means we found no public documentation of that capability, not that the vendor cannot do it.