CAIN-42 CAIN Studio

How CAIN-42 compares · Protocols & infrastructure

CAIN-42 vs A2A v1.0

Agent2Agent (A2A) v1.0 (2026-03-12) standardizes agent-to-agent communication: Agent Cards at .well-known, signed cards for identity, JSON-RPC/gRPC/HTTP bindings and security schemes. Its practitioner guidance notes the protocol does not itself decide which agent to trust.

What A2A v1.0 does well

  • A standard, well-supported agent-to-agent protocol.
  • Signed Agent Cards for cryptographic identity.
  • Broad vendor support across clouds.

What CAIN-42 does differently

  • Enforces at the tool-call boundary, before anything runs.
  • Orders authorization through a Byzantine quorum (3-of-4): one "yes" is never enough.
  • Leaves a per-action signed receipt you can verify offline with a clean-room verifier.
  • Authority continuity: a change to the model, tool, memory, skill or delegation forces a re-check.
  • Self-serve from $19.75/mo; runs hosted, self-hosted or air-gapped.

Capability difference

CapabilityCAIN-42A2A v1.0Source (verified 2026-10-14)
Primary focusRuntime governance in the execution pathAgent-to-agent transportA2A source page
verified 2026-10-14
Delegation attenuation proofYes (child authority ≤ parent)Described; trust policy outside the protocol
Decides which agent is trustedYes (authority continuity)No (the protocol excludes trust policy)
Per-action signed receipt, offline-verifiableYes — Ed25519, hash-chained, offline-verifiableSigned Agent Cards
Byzantine-ordered authorization (quorum cert)Yes — 3-of-4 PBFT quorum certificateNot in scope
Public entry price$19.75/mo self-serveOpen standard

When to pick which

Use A2A for agent-to-agent messaging. Use CAIN-42 for the authority and trust layer when those agents act.

Based on each vendor's public homepage and product pages, last reviewed 2026-10-14. No affiliation and no claim about their internals. "No*" means we found no public documentation of that capability, not that the vendor cannot do it.