CAIN-42 CAIN Studio

AGENTIC AI 75 · #34

Clinical-trial oversight agents

Medable announced customer adoption of an agent providing intelligence across clinical-development systems.

Last reviewed 2026-11-11

Agentic AI 75 / #34

PROPOSEDMoat 4 · Execution Provenance & AttestationBundle · Runtime Containment & EvidenceStream 4

2026 status: Announced customer adoption · Category: Clinical operations

The 2026 development

Medable announced customer adoption of an agent providing intelligence across clinical-development systems.

The governance gap

Trial oversight touches regulated records. An agent that summarises or flags a trial event needs an audit trail that distinguishes the source record from the agent's interpretation.

Where CAIN-42 fits: Moat 4 — Execution Provenance & Attestation

Core question: Can we prove what actually happened? Hash-chained, signed records binding decision to execution to observable effect.

Record the source document, the extracted fact, the agent's interpretation and the human reviewer as separate layers. A flag is a proposal, not a finding.

How the wiring works

  1. Ingest the source record with a content digest.
  2. Extract facts and label them as extracted, not verified.
  3. Attach the agent's interpretation as a separate layer.
  4. Require a named reviewer before the flag enters the trial record.

What is real today

PROPOSED A design mapping only. No dedicated implementation exists yet; do not buy this as a finished control.

No clinical-trial connector or regulated validation exists in this repository. Do not treat this page as clinical or regulatory advice.

Component in this repositoryWhat the module says it is
cain/compliance.pyCAIN Trust Fabric - Regulatory Compliance & Certification Engine (Phase 4)
cain/worm_export.pyCAIN Trust Fabric - tamper-evident WORM Causal Evidence Fabric (Phase 4)
cain/causality/evidence.pyCAIN CAUSALITY — Causal Evidence Independence Graph (Prompt CAUSALITY, Phase 9).
cain/cain_iso42001_notary.pyCAIN Phase A+++ - Continuous Statutory Compliance Notary (ISO 42001 & EU AI Act).

Descriptions are the first line of each module's own docstring, read without importing it. A module path is a pointer into this repository, not a hosted endpoint. Its existence is checked by the test suite; its status for this use is the label above.

Check it yourself

Commercial package

OfferRegulated Workflow Evidence Review
BuyerClinical sponsors and CROs
Price (proposal)$7,500–$15,000 per engagement
BundleRuntime Containment & Evidence — Contain first, then prove what happened.
Operator streamStream 4 of the 10-stream operator playbook

SOC, incident response, compliance, enterprise IT is the bundle buyer. The entry offer for this bundle is Runtime containment review; signed evidence pack; the range is $2,500–$5,000 per review; $2,000–$10,000 per evidence pack. A price on this page is a proposal, not a validated rate, and no customer is claimed.

Buy this as a product or service

CAIN-A75-034 — Regulated Workflow Evidence Review DELIVERABLE

A bounded engine run on the buyer's sample: findings, a written report, and a SHA-256 artifact manifest. The manifest is unsigned: it is not a signature and not an attestation.

Kind: Evidence Pack · Price (proposal): $7,500–$15,000 per engagement · Lead time: 5 business days.

Open the product page · all 75 products

What this page does not claim

What this page is not. CAIN-42 is not affiliated with, endorsed by, integrated into, or shipped with the organisation named in the 2026 item. The item is public context; the page describes how CAIN-42 would govern that class of capability. No page here claims a customer, a partnership, a certification, a patent, or a production integration. Prices are proposals. Built by a three-person team.

← #33 Pathology agents as interoperable MCP toolsAll 75#35 Voice agents that reason while listening →